A Return to the 1996 Class Project?


If the first weeks of Gwede Manthashe`s appointment as the Minister of Mineral Resources was characterised by the continuation of the arrogance which has become synonymous with the Minerals Portfolio when he ignored a court order to consult with MACUA and other organised community networks, then the first months of the Minister`s tenure has been marked by the return to the 1996 “Class Project” which not only deepened and extended the gross inequalities of South African Society, but which also led to the rise of an even more dubious Class Capture Project headed by Jacob Zuma.

If the 1996 Class Project was a portend of the deep divisions that such narrow accumulation strategies embody, then South Africa should be seriously concerned by the blatant way the Minister has attempted to construct a false narrative which suggests that “bridges are being built to mend the trust deficit and ensure that extraction benefits everyone via transformation and growth”.

Instead of building bridges and mending the trust deficit, the Minister`s consultations has further alienated communities and has reinforced their worst fears that the Minister is determined to exclude community voices from their constitutionally enshrined right to participate in their own governance.

Besides the long list of concerns that communities have raised with the process of consultations, the Minister has been standing on these platforms and berating communities for thinking that “mining companies are charities” and has instead been recorded as saying that:
“We need to understand that the mining charter and other BEE programmes are in place to create black capitalist elites. If you do not want to be a capitalist then BEE is not for you. Government has tried to make BEE more accessible by adding the “Broad Based” in front of BEE but the result was still the same – creating black capitalist elites. If you do not want to be a capitalist then you cannot participate in BEE"

While the Minister`s comments may be music to the ears of the politically connected elites and the mine bosses at the Chamber of Mines, the fact of the matter is that the Minister has completely misrepresented the intended outcomes of the Mining Charter and the legislation it is based on.

The Legislation that underpins the Mining Charter specifically states that the Charter is aimed at ensuring “the attainment of Government's objectives of redressing historical, social and economic inequalities as stated in the Constitution“ and the Charter must furthermore meet the objectives contained in section 2 of the Act which include the mandate to “ensure that holders of mining and production rights contribute towards the socio-economic development of the areas in which they are operating.”

If the Minister now unashamedly contends that only a “black capitalist elite” are entitled to the benefits of redressing the historical, social and economic inequalities, then I would suggest that he clears such a constitutional amendment with the Constitutional Court first.

MACUA has consistently contended that the model of only creating black capitalist elites has not worked and instead it has led to greater inequalities in the sector and in society in general and this reality has informed their efforts to seek a place at the negotiating table to offer new ideas of broad inclusive models of economic development.

MACUA itself was born out of the misery and discontent that epitomises the life of communities who suffer the most egregious injustices at the hand of a mining regime that has completely trampled all over the dignity of millions.

After years of knocking at the door of those in power and receiving only arrogant refusals, MACUA along with other community networks, such as WAMUA and MEJCON went to court to claim its constitutional rights. At the 11th hour the new President made heart rendering promises of its commitment to ensuring that communities are "integrally involved" in consultations and the court affirmed that as party to the court application, MACUA should be involved in the formulation of the Charter.

The Presidents words were taken as a bond and the rule of law was accepted as unchallenged, yet today, if anything, MACUA and mining affected communities are even further removed from the integral involvement in the formulation of the Mining Charter promised by the President and the Court.

At the five “consultations” held by the Minister to date, communities have recorded that among a host of manoeuvres by the Minister to avoid proper consultations on the formulation of the charter, the process has been marred by the following:
·       
  •           Notice period on dates and venues have been managed like state secrets with short notice periods.
  • ·       Venues have been shifted at short notice and often moved to more inaccessible areas. (in one instance in Kathu the meeting at the Town Hall was cancelled without notice and moved to a game lodge outside of town and community members had to struggle for 2 hours to find the place)
  • ·         Even though The Minister`s special advisor promised to provide transport and logistic support for communities to attend the consultations, this commitment has still not been forth coming.
  • ·         No copies of the Charter were provided to communities to engage with it.
  • ·         Community members have been actively barred from entering venues and attending the consultations.
  • ·         Attendance at the consultations were generally by invitation only with communities often poorly represented and an abundance of business and mine owners, councillors and traditional leaders present.
  • ·         In one instance councillors are reported to have told community members that they need not go to the venue as the Minister would be coming to them. Needless to say, the Minister never pitched.
  • ·         Community inputs were often strictly controlled with many being denied opportunities to speak and often questions about the sham process were brushed aside or went unanswered in the meetings with no form of recourse provided.
  • ·         The programme was often not completed with many meetings ending early with time allocated to community input often being cut short to achieve this.

With the Minister going around claiming that 80% of the Charter is complete, without having received any inputs from communities, and that the May deadline will be met, again without having engaged “relevant and interested stakeholders” in any type of meaningful consultation, the situation seems set to end up in an unfortunate logjam and possible court challenges to the process.

It`s ironic then, that the effort to rush the process to ensure stability and certainty in the sector may very well end up being the very reason stability and certainty is not provided to the sector.

Despite all this, we continue to assume, in hope and goodwill, that these are merely misunderstandings and that the spirit of our constitution which envisages an equal society in which all share and participate, will win out against the meanspirited narrow accumulation-at-all-costs mantra, which has marked the worst years of our past and which threaten to dominate our society once again.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Selling the Family Silver: Power, Extraction, and the False Promise of Balance in South Africa’s Political Economy

Image
  Introduction: Davos , Washington , and the Pedagogy of Humiliation There is something quietly revealing about South Africa’s annual pilgrimage to Davos. There, amid the rituals of elite networking and the theatre of global consensus, South African leaders encounter the realities of power stripped of ceremony: conditional access, asymmetrical bargaining, and the expectation of compliance dressed up as partnership.  It is an experience uncomfortably familiar to those lower down the domestic hierarchy; mining-affected communities, the working poor, and those whose lives are shaped by decisions taken elsewhere and justified after the fact. The irony is not that South Africa is treated poorly at Davos or in Washington, but that its political leadership appears perpetually surprised when it is. When President Ramaphosa travelled to Washington and was treated as an inconvenience rather than a partner, some commentators rushed to frame the moment as an aberration, a function of Donald...
Read more

The Madlanga Commission Must Not Ignore the Billion-Rand Smoking Gun.

Image
    A billion-rand policing operation may have been guided not by crime intelligence or public-safety imperatives, but by a government apparatus whose strategic orientation has become increasingly indistinguishable from the corporate mining lobby and criminal interests. When MACUA submitted evidence to the Madlanga Commission raising serious concerns about the evidence that had emerged in the Madlanga Commission about Operation Vala Umgodi and the deaths in Stilfontein, the Commission acknowledged receipt, but its hearings have yet to reflect any engagement with the issues raised. Instead, the inquiry has focused almost exclusively on the Political Killings Task Team (PKTT) and the Ekhurhuleni Metropolitan Police Department . To an extent, this is understandable. The Commission was established in response to allegations by General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi that the PKTT had been disbanded due to improper links between senior politicians and criminal syndicates. The inquiry was b...
Read more

South Africa Must Defend Its Sovereign Wealth, Before It’s All Sold to the Highest Bidder

Image
  When Anglo American Plc announced its plan to merge with Canada’s Teck Resources and relocate its holding structure to Vancouver, it was not merely another corporate transaction. It was a seismic act of capital flight, the slow-motion exit of one of South Africa’s most historically powerful corporations, taking with it a century’s worth of accumulated wealth, expertise, and control over our national mineral assets. As economist DumaGqubule outlines in his recently released report, The Anglo–Teck Merger: A Global Power Play , this deal is not about efficiency or synergy; it is about jurisdiction. It is about where wealth will be controlled, where taxes will be paid, and where accountability will end. It is a reminder that, despite our constitutional commitment to economic sovereignty, South Africa still lacks the institutional and legislative backbone to protect its sovereign mineral wealth from transnational looting disguised as “global investment.” While Canada has built ...
Read more