They called him “The Seagull”. Deconstructing Marcus Jooste`s last missive
They called him “TheSeagull”. The nickname, which was only
uttered behind closed doors and among friends, was a name that Marcus Jooste
had earned, not by virtue of his free flying nature, but instead this name was
acquired as a result of his uncompromising hardnosed executive style. Marcus was the seagull because he would fly
in, shit all over his executives and then fly out.
In one particular nasty moment in which Marcus displayed his
propensity for flying in and shitting on people, he made sure that he had a
captive audience and used the moment for maximum humiliation.
It was after eight on a Friday evening when executives of
one of the groups companies, received an sms demanding their presence at the
office the next morning at 8am sharp. Being called to an urgent meeting on a
Saturday morning by the Chief executive officer of the group was a clear
indication that they were either going to receive an unprecedented bonus, or
there was some serious shitting in the offing.
It was with great trepidation that the management team
arrived at the office that Saturday morning. Marcus was already in a meeting
with the Managing Director of the company but it was clear that sparks were
flying and Marcus was in full battle cry. The poor MD was at a loss for words
as the tirade appeared to have no end. Eventually he literally dragged the MD
and the rest of the management team on a tour of the factory, pointing out
pallets that were incorrectly stacked or unevenly packed, dust on the floor and
any small infraction that could serve as fuel for his indignation and disgust
at the quality of the management he was about to fire.
After subjecting the MD to a humiliating tirade, he
summarily told the MD to “get out of my fucking factory”.
Such was the nature of “the Seagull”. The acerbic nature of his displeasure would
leave even the most hardened executive with tears in the eyes.
Built around a close group of friends who had all studied at
Stellenbosch University, the Stellenbosch Afrikaner mafia, as the close group
of trusted lieutenants around Marcus was known, instilled a domineering,
patriarchal, misogynist and racist culture in which no human emotion was spared
when it came to that all powerful aphrodisiac, profit and money.
The company which was later to become known as Steinhoff,
was from its outset built on the same logic that would eventually see the
pyramid collapse in spectacular fashion. Using his Afrikaner connections to
people such as Christo Wiese, Marcus had the uncanny ability to raise funds to
acquire loss making businesses and to continually conglomerate them in order to
hide losses while building economies of scale.
The promised economies of scale were notoriously difficult
to achieve and soon the logic changed from building economies of scale to vertical
and horizontal integration. Starting with the Gomma-Gomma Group of furniture manufacturers,
acquiring other furniture manufactures along the way, Marcus started to buy
shares in transport companies and forestry companies promising to integrate the
entire value chain, thus delivering super profits.
When the promised returns failed to materialise, the quick
fix was to acquire an even bigger company within which the losses could be
absorbed or magically made to disappear.
The Stellenbosch Afrikaner mafia that conglomerated the
Steinhoff empire were all sophisticated accountants and it soon became a
trademark of the group that when a manufacturing business needed a leader, it
was to the Stellenbosch educated Afrikaner accountants that Marcus turned to.
The culture was decidedly Macho Afrikaner and management was
dominated and controlled in effect by the Stellenbosch educated Afrikaner
accountants. Within this culture where there were No Women and only a few faces
of colour, the interests of the country were secondary and the importance of
BEE and Affirmative action a major hindrance to the main project of getting
rich.
“We can’t get rich by earning a salary” was Marcus` common
reminder to his executives. Shares were Marcus` preferred currency. Executives around him were fed a constant
stream of shares through share schemes and this kept all his lieutenants and
executives docile and unquestioning.
Only the fools would question the mafia about anything from strategy to
accounting practises and those who were foolish enough to question, soon found
themselves on the streets.
It is in light of this macho domineering culture that
Marcus` last missive to his colleagues should be read.
He was not sorry that he had done the wrong thing, only
sorry that he was caught. In true macho
style he was going to face the “consequences like a man”. Despite his rise to the top, and maybe
because of his rise to the top, Marcus had no idea that our society had morphed
into a pluralistic society in which the “dumb jock” was no longer the standard
by which we measured integrity. In fact if anything his promise to take it like
a man shows how corporate culture, ensconced as it is in the central ideas of
money, profits and patriarchy, become insulated from developments in the rest
of society, simply because their money provides them with the magical power
that ensures that everybody looks the other way.
The Steinhoff dream was unmistakably the maintenance of an anachronistic
“old boys club”, where misogyny and racism was celebrated and where the pursuit
of wealth was all important. One need
look no further than the demographic make-up of the Steinhoff Head Office staff
to verify the insular nature of the Steinhoff dream.
From government SOE`s who invested in Steinhoff, to
investment bankers and fund managers, the most important thing was not the
racist patriarchal misogyny of the group, it was about the money and profits
that could be derived. The virtue of profit and money had triumphed over the
values enshrined in the constitution, which was won only by the blood of so
many.
Marcus did not make a mistake, and he did not do it alone,
this much is abundantly clear. From Christo Wiese to every single board member
and executive manager, they were most certainly aware of the rot that was
underfoot, but were either earning too much to blow the whistle, or too spineless to stand up for right.
The question South Africa now faces is whether the culture
of money and profit has truly grown so powerful that all our constitutional
values are worthless in the face of it.


Comments
Post a Comment