The Future is Non Partisan.
In the early hours of Monday 31 August 2015, hundreds of
residents took to the streets and began what was to become a two weeks long
protest march. For two weeks residents blockaded the roads and disrupted the
everyday rhythm of their exploitation and oppression.
The target,
AngloPlatinum, who has for decades been
at the centre of violating their Right to Food, their Right to Water, their
Right to Housing and their Right to a Healthy Environment. As a result, many
workers at the Mogalakwena mine could not report for work. Protesters burnt down and vandalised a part
of the Mapela traditional authority offices, the chiefs’ house and the
community development infrastructure provided by the mine, including the sports
stadium and the agricultural project at Ga-Chaba.
Many of the protesters rarely visited their homes during the
strike. They sang and demonstrated on the streets day and night. Women cooked
meals along the road for everyone. Villagers put together some money and bought
food supplies from town. Others brought whatever uncooked food they had from
their homes. Pots were kept boiling on the streets and so was the strength of
solidarity among the strikers.
There was heavy police presence at times for the
duration of the strike in Mapela.From time to time police tried to disperse
the protesters by shooting with rubber bullets to disperse the crowd. More than
50 protesters were arrested and charged with public violence, damage to
property and other charges. One of the protesters, a woman, was shot and
injured during these shootings.
The two weeks of solidarity and action by the residents
garnered some media coverage and eventually forced the then Minister of Mineral
resources Ngaoko Ramthlodi to intervene to find ways to reopen the most
profitable mine in the Anglo American stable.
Eventually the South African Huma Rights Commission managed
to bring all the stakeholders together around the table to find solutions. The
meaning of this I will address in a separate blog post.
Then on the 14th of October students at Wits
University began what was to become a national movement of students to fight
against the proposed fee increases at universities. The movement quickly
gathered momentum, winning widespread support from civil society, academics and
parents.
Besides the daily marches and shutting down several
universities, students also marched on Parliament, the ANC headquarters and the
Union Buildings in a process of rolling mass action that eventually forced a
reluctant government to acquiesce to the students demand for 0% fee increase in
2016.
The movement was characterised, just as in countless struggles across the country, by the high discipline of the
students, who organised not only marches and protests, but also study sessions,
education and entertainment sessions as well as ensuring that the spaces they
occupied were cleaned daily and where protests were held, litter was collected
and spaces left clean and orderly.
Much like the Ga-Mapela communities in Limpopo, or the
Thubatsi communities in Sekhukune, the students had forged Non-Partisan,
Non-Sexist, Non-Racist and Non-Sectarian spaces that ensured maximum unity and
cohesion. In the face of this collective will, and determined action, the ANC
was left with little choice but to reach out to the students in a vain attempt
at deflecting their complicity in the status quo, while government, initially
acting as if there was “no crises” soon found themselves capitulating to the
mass of anger that had flowed onto the streets on Pretoria, Johannesburg, Cape
Town, Stellenbosch, Grahamstown, Potchestroom, and Umtata.
The Minister of Higher Education, refused to acknowledge a
crises, and naively quipping about government forming a students must fall
movement if they did not get back into line.
The president himself remained hidden behind his bodyguards
in stoic silence and Parliament was nearly stormed as they carried on with
business as usual in the face of student protests.
There can be little doubt that South Africa has changed
forever. Where previously, society had seen the “born-free” generation as a
passive line of potential middle class entrants, bereft of political
understanding and all too eager to join the avenue of patronage politics, now
exists a radical cohort of angry students who have seen that a better world is
possible.
In 1976, when students rose up in a similar display of youth
and radicalism, they had laid the basis of the final push to end the Apartheid
regime. It was the student leaders of the 1976 uprisings that introduced a new
political awareness and ushered in a student rebellion in the 1980`s that
brought the mighty Apartheid regime to its knees.
Today the new generation of radical students, like the
forebears of 1976, have shifted their demands from immediate demands such as an
end to Afrikaans in schools in 1976 and no fee increases in 2015, to more
radical systemic and structural demands such as an end to Bantu education and
Free Education for All.
Only time will tell how this generation, with its innovation
and energy, and armed with a radical new political analysis of the South
African question, will fulfil its own mission.
But as we reflect on the victories of today and challenges
ahead, it is important to draw lessons that must inform our future actions.
Some of the lessons over the last few months are:
1. Government remains in denial about its role within
society and believes that it is above the people- arrogant enough to leave
thousands of angry young people milling in the heat for hours, while they
enjoyed the comfort of air-conditioned rooms and no doubt a sumptuous buffet. Government
refuses to acknowledge in its practice that it is accountable to the people, while
the President steadfastly, like a Royal monarch, refused to address students, preferring
the comfort and luxury of speaking to an uncritical and unresponsive camera.
It
will take consistent action, both in the streets and at the polls to shake the
arrogance of a government that believes it is untouchable. Finding ways to act
in solidarity, while not “hijacking” the struggles of others will be one of the
key challenges for the broad progressive movement, as our different and
collective struggles intensify.
2. Student leaders were outfoxed at the last moment, by
being drawn into the arrogance of government that believes it can manufacture
solutions without the input of the people. This has left their credibility in
question and students angry, leaderless and ultimately created the space for
anger to trump democratic action.
Throughout the weeks of protest, student
leaders had stood firm on collective leadership and insisted on humbling the
University Administrations and Officials when dealing with students. At the
last hurdle, student leadership abandoned their resolve and sought a place at
the opulent table leaving the masses sweltering in the heat.
This is not a new
phenomenon and we saw similar disconnects between leaders and the people in
transition decade of the 1990`s. We have to ask ourselves why we can have
collective and humble leadership throughout the period of mass action, but we
abandon this revolutionary practice at the drop of a hat, forsaking the very
value that had got us to the table in the first place.
This tendency towards
elite solutions thus remains an integral value of political parties and
movements. It is a tendency that we should guard against with vigour.
3. The ANC has been left exposed as a fraud who sought to
claim the student`s victory and to deflect the legitimate anger of students who
see the ANC as a legitimate target and the ultimate power that directs the
efforts of government.
In a useful article, in the Washington Post, Daniel de
Kadt summarises the ANC`s response, at least its social media response to the
protests as follow; “their response to
the protests appears to be a quintessential example of patronage politics.
While the protests were focused on university campuses and administrations, the
ANC encouraged them very gently from a distance. Once the protests targeted the
ANC, its president and its ministers swiftly changed tack, first adopting a
stoic repressive silence, and then a rapid outreach to students and policy
capitulation”.
The ANC and the Youth League in particular, even tried to
claim the movement and protests as its own. Rank opportunism that was broadly
seen for what it is but one which nonetheless intensifies the ANC`s own
internal struggles to move beyond the staid leaders of the Pre-1994 era.
This
battle, which has already seen the EFF breakaway with large numbers of ANC
youth and which now is being stage managed from Luthuli House, with docile handpicked
youth leaders, will still have to respond to the impatient militant youth who
are increasingly alienated from the arrogant leadership.
4. What we call democracy is hopelessly inadequate and has
been exposed over the last decade with the rise in protests but specifically with
the student movement who demanded a say in the issues that directly affect
them.
The idea that an elite can forever decide for the masses is
flawed and we need an urgent dialogue to reconstruct a democracy that is closer
to the people, especially the youth. It is their impatience that will present
the greatest challenge to an arrogant and out of touch elite government and
societal leadership.
The demand to be included in the decision making processes
that affect us in every sphere of our lives, have manifested in Marikana, De
Doorns, Bonteheuwel, Mokopane, Thubatse, Wits, UCT, Stellenbosch and in
countless communities across the country. As a society, we expend so much
effort at ad hoc responses to these calls for greater democracy that it would arguably
be much more efficient, and reduce so
much tension, if we were to formally institutionalize the rights of everybody
to have a voice in the affairs that directly affect them.. This remains the
thread that runs through every single one of the thousands of protests that
emerge in SA annually.
The reality unfortunately is, that ideas about democracy,
real democracy that includes people and provides everyone with an opportunity
to have a voice, is not a practical possibility for those who hold power. Real
Democracy would mean an end to high salaries, body guards, access to tenders
and dispensing of patronage. Real democracy would mean that constituents would
actually get a fair deal and enjoy real and substantive equality.
What we have witnessed over the last weeks, and what most
South Africans know through their battles to bring down Apartheid, is that
power will not concede without a fight. The students and communities like those
in Mokopane, have shown that it is only through collective action that Power will
yield. Democracy is not only an idea, it is a practise that must be fought for
every single day, in every single location.
5. Non Partisan, Non Sectarian Struggles have become the new
vehicle of change. The party system has become so corrupted that not even ANC
Youth and Members have any faith that they are able to bring about change
through their daily engagements within their own party.
It was ANC youth who
agitated to storm the Union Buildings on Friday. Whether they were sent in as
Agent provocateurs is a discussion for another day. The point I would like to
focus on here, is the extent that young people feel alienated from government
and party leaders.
The party system eseentially reproduces the same inequalities
of society, creating an elite like aristocracy that through their lofty
positions of power are able to dispense patronage, in the process subverting
any democracy that might exist within the structures of the Party. The ANC
itself has admitted that the practise of buying votes is widespread and ubiquitous.
As long as power is located at the top of the hierarchy, the reality of
arrogant leaders and corruption will remain a pathology that will hamper our
societal progress.
Non Partisan, Non-Sexist, Non-Racial, Non-Sectarian
struggles and movements focus sharply on issues that affect people and as it is
not a permanent institution, the lures of power and privilege, while still
present, is greatly reduced by the praxis of democracy and collective agency.
This type of convergence, beyond party political lines, and beyond narrow
interests, presents the surest way to move change.
Of course the challenge of institutional entrenchment as the
next step to impacting on decisions was visibly played out when the student
leaders disappeared into the Lion`s Den for 5 hours on Friday. Yet these are
not perfect solutions, they are beacons and warnings of the dangers that lurk
in the halls of elitist party politics. How we heed those warnings and what we
do to overcome them, can only be a collective process.
6. Unresponsive authorities, often feed the soil of
discontent that nurtures movements of people, who essentially start with small
achievable demands. As the arrogance of those in authority sets in, demands
focusing on broader systemic and structural issues are allowed to flourish.
The lesson for those in authority is that responsive
government has much less upheaval with greater equality.
And the lesson for activists and those who face the material
conditions of poverty, oppression, and exclusion is
"sweat the small
stuff and the big ones will come"
As the students regroup and refocus their efforts towards
exams and then towards the next battle in the war for equality; we wish them well,
for theirs is a struggle that carries the hope of not only this generation, but
of generations to come.
As society absorbs the momentous moment in our history, let
us realise that our silence is our complicity in the ills and inequalities our
children face. Sekunjalo.

Comments
Post a Comment