Robert Mcbride: Sentiments, Ideologies and Moving Forward:
Corruption and Cadre deployments exist in every part of the
world. Hell, the entire Western Neo liberal edifice is constructed on just
that. I have great respect for Robert and other cadre`s who have performed so
valiantly in the struggle against apartheid. For this, the ANC and the people
of South Africa owe him and others like him a debt of gratitude. No, I am not
going to argue “behaviour pre and post 1994”, even though there might be merit
in such an argument and even though I believe that the ANC should accommodate
him within their own structures rather than use state positions to reward
cadres.
No I am not going to use the race card either.
My concern rather, is the context of the appointment. Firstly
it is the context of a contested state in which the levers of state power has
become the key prize in an ongoing battle between the political elites who
happen to be mainly located within the ANC, but which has also seen a growing
fragmentation of the centre of power. I leave you to decide if Yeats is
applicable yet.
It is also the context of rampant corruption and looting of
state resources, as well as the increasing tendency of the state to utilize the
police force to further personal and political agenda`s as well as to use the
police to further the agenda of capital in the most murderous way. Not to
mention the apparent unraveling of the police force itself with internal
bickering and open aggression among members. All ostensibly linked to access
to POWER.
African Scholars have identified a number of factors that
foster and contribute to corruption in Africa and consequently leads to failed
states which in turn implies, failed the people. Allow me to consider these and
to try and identify where South Africa stands in this regard.
These are,
1.
The total
exercise, by the ruling elite, of the state, of all power attached to national sovereignty.
This includes the ability of the state to dispense patronage within in all sectors
of the economy and the state. Despite rigorous constitutional limitations and institutions
such as the Public Protectors Office, it would not be irrational to reach a
conclusion which suggests that the South African state has been used in this
fashion and that it continues to be used for the purpose of patronage.
2.
The expanded role of the state and an
expanding bureaucracy. While it could be argued that the South African State has adhered to
the most rigorous neoliberal fiscal policies, the same cannot be said about its
approach to the state bureaucracy. The state bureaucracy has expanded significantly.
This was mainly to create employment in a stagnating employment environment,
but has also more sinisterly been used as a conduit for patronage. The
resultant effect of service delivery failure is another debate for another
time. Suffice to say that opportunities for patronage has been democratised
among the clients of the patrons which in turn leads to further patronage and
so forth.
3. Centralised Economic Activity. The state
has followed neoliberal policy guidelines on this and has consistently engaged
capital in allocating economic activity, which ironically has meant that it has
received significant opposition and protests around its focus on high end
economic practices such as building stadiums and elite trains and transport
systems. The state has however followed Capitals lead on most major economic
activities which have resulted in a considerable network of patronage and
clientalism within the business arena. The range of corruption cases between
business and state employees attest to this. In the states, defense however,
this type of corruption has not yet led to the same level of developmental
retardation seen on the rest of the continent.
4. The lack of the rule of law. South Africa
has not been subject to a blatant breakdown of the rule of law, and has one of
the best legal systems on the continent if one uses an elitist and business conception
of the law. The same cannot be said for the many poor communities who have been
dispossessed of their land and livelihood but that is another discussion. The point to consider here is the ability of
patrons to manipulate the levers of the law to promote or hide their nefarious activities.
Again there are numerous cases within South Africa that would attest to this,
but again not to the same extent as found on the rest of the continent. The
conviction of Jackie Selebi stands out as a beacon, even if it was driven by
political considerations.The point though, is that there are other examples where the levers within the legal system has been used to avoid prosecution of the political elite.(No Names on this one....and No prizes for guessing)
5. The lack of Exemplary leadership.
Having a president who, at least on the surface, maintains a network of patronage
does not provide the leadership one would expect of a once revolutionary
movement that held the highest ideals of selflessness and sacrifice, and does
not promote exemplary governance within both the state and the sociocultural
domain. My firm belief is that people will do whatever they can get away with,
and when your boss has his fingers in the cookie jar, and both you and he knows
it, he is not exactly going to fire you for doing the same. As for Mcbride,
this is not to say that he has his hands or will have his hands in the cookie
jar, but it does raise some important issues about exemplary leadership,
especially in such an important role of IPID, considering the analysis above of
the Police increasingly being used as a lever of power by the political elites.
The question then for
us to consider, cannot be confined to merely questions of transformation/race
and liberalism, it has to include the objective realities of a contested
future.
This contestation is not only between the political elites for control of the state, but also the contestation of the state, by the forces of progress and development that seeks to place working class people not profits or rentier patronage, at the centre of the locus of power .
South Africa does not score well on the key factors that have contributed to corruption in Africa and this trend portends ill weather and rough seas ahead.(if not misery and poverty for the working classes)
This contestation is not only between the political elites for control of the state, but also the contestation of the state, by the forces of progress and development that seeks to place working class people not profits or rentier patronage, at the centre of the locus of power .
South Africa does not score well on the key factors that have contributed to corruption in Africa and this trend portends ill weather and rough seas ahead.(if not misery and poverty for the working classes)
The question then is
not if Robert McBride is an appropriate candidate, but whether his appointment
takes us forward towards a new horizon or whether it reinforces the status quo.

Comments
Post a Comment